BD's top fifty albums of all time - Page 5

larvtard · #41 05-05-2012, 08:11 PM

I don't understand peoples' gripes with sub-genres or sub-sub-genres. I like to organize my music, ese! Do you just not like the name "Entombed-core?" Okay, can you suggest another name? It's definitely a legitimate sub-sub-genre.

BloodoftheKings · #42 05-05-2012, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larvtard

I don't understand peoples' gripes with sub-genres. I like to organize my music, ese! Do you just not like the name "Entombed-core?" Okay, can you suggest another name? It's definitely a legitimate sub-sub-genre.

I don't have a problem with sub-genres. I have a problem with sub-sub-genres.

treghet · #43 05-05-2012, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larvtard

I don't understand peoples' gripes with sub-genres. I like to organize my music, ese! Do you just not like the name "Entombed-core?" Okay, can you suggest another name? It's definitely a legitimate sub-sub-genre.

Entombedcore is not a legitimate genre.

Just because one band sounds a bit different from their peers doesn't mean they need to be classified as a new genre. I mean, doesn't Slayer sound a hell of a lot different from Megadeth? Yet we call both of them thrash metal.

larvtard · #44 05-05-2012, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treghet

Entombedcore is not a legitimate genre.

Just because one band sounds a bit different from their peers doesn't mean they need to be classified as a new genre. I mean, doesn't Slayer sound a hell of a lot different from Megadeth? Yet we call both of them thrash metal.

Well, if you thought of a label to differentiate Slayer from Megadeth, then I'd use it