Slipknot -- Athens, Greece -- June 17th, 2011

[jd091]

I like the large absence of All Hope is Lost. That album sucks a big one.

[larvtard]

Originally Posted by makethemsuffer12

? Heretic is a staple.

according to setlist.fm they only played it once in '09 and 31 times in '08 (they did 58 shows that year)

Originally Posted by jd091

I like the large absence of All Hope is Gone. That album sucks a big one.

After all these years they are still ignoring the best songs from there

[jd091]

Woah... double post, man.

Edit: Damn, you deleted that fast

[Shadowswillfall414]

Im more excited to see there headlining set which will probably have more songs since they opened for maiden here.

[larvtard]

Originally Posted by jd091

Woah... double post, man.

Edit: Damn, you deleted that fast

yeah for some reason I'm anal about double posts

[jd091]

Originally Posted by Shadowswillfall414

Im more excited to see there headlining set

There? Where? I don't see it.

[larvtard]

Originally Posted by jd091

There? Where? I don't see it.

This reminds me. Earlier I was thinking about something- the pretty common misconception of its and it's is by far the least of the grammar nazis' collective worries. I can see why people would mistake the two, because the apostrophe is usually used as a sign of the possessive. In this case, the apostrophe in it's means it is, but let's say you were saying Ben's, you could use that apostrophe as both a possessive and Ben is. Double standard bro

[jd091]

Originally Posted by logAnarchy

This reminds me. Earlier I was thinking about something- the pretty common misconception of its and it's is by far the least of the grammar nazis' collective worries. I can see why people would mistake the two, because the apostrophe is usually used as a sign of the possessive. In this case, the apostrophe in it's means it is, but let's say you were saying Ben's, you could use that apostrophe as both a possessive and Ben is. Double standard bro

Hmm. Astute point. I've noticed that too, but I understand how in situations it's (see what I did there) a little out of the way to include a apostrophe. You could be on a smartphone, or just working on typing faster. You're just lazy. With the misconception of they're, their, and there, it implies a larger grammar misconception of the person's mind rather than a common laziness. A much more heinous crime, no?

[kommie]

Originally Posted by jd091

I like the large absence of All Hope is Lost. That album sucks a big one.

This.

[larvtard]

Originally Posted by jd091

Hmm. Astute point. I've noticed that too, but I understand how in situations it's (see what I did there) a little out of the way to include a apostrophe. You could be on a smartphone, or just working on typing faster. You're just lazy. With the misconception of they're, their, and there, it implies a larger grammar misconception of the person's mind rather than a common laziness. A much more heinous crime, no?

Yes, exactly. Personally the biggest crime in my book is 'would of.' Offenders may defend themselves by saying "that's how people pronounce out loud, so I got confused," but I can't forgive that one at all for two reasons.

1) When people say it out loud they are pronouncing the contraction 'would've.' Everyone should be familiar with contractions.
2) You can't use 'of' before a active present tense verb (not -ing). That doesn't make any grammatical sense whatsoever.