Originally Posted by Epidemic Reign
I generally prefer track-by-track reviews. They're often more thorough, whereas many standard reviews tend to focus on the high points and the low points and kind of ignore everything in-between, while the individual track ratings still make the highs and lows easily discernible at a glance.
It's not a good approach in a journalistic sense, but for informal purposes I think it's a fine format.
Me too. I agree w/ all your points.
And to the poster, very cool review. I like the album as well. Need to give it another complete listen on 2 before I give it a review.