Originally Posted by larvtard
>"I am posting a review"
>posts a track-by-track review
I generally prefer track-by-track reviews. They're often more thorough, whereas many standard reviews tend to focus on the high points and the low points and kind of ignore everything in-between, while the individual track ratings still make the highs and lows easily discernible at a glance.
It's not a good approach in a journalistic sense, but for informal purposes I think it's a fine format.